Well it didn’t take long to get some response, and further thoughts,
from yesterday’s blog story … The prohibition of cannabis … “is it worth it –
or can we do better by trying something else?”
Again these are just a sample of what came in, but it is a fair
representation of all comments that have been made …
Cigarettes are legal so why isn't pot? |
"You
can't legislate morality. Look at drugs. To stop the drug issue … stop buying
drugs. Keep it simple. The only person I can change is me."
A response was quick to arrive to that:
The notion that "you can't legislate morality" is philosophically untenable. All legislation is a reflection of a certain moral code.
The notion that "you can't legislate morality" is philosophically untenable. All legislation is a reflection of a certain moral code.
When we set special speed
limits in school zones, we do so based on some kind of moral presupposition
about the intrinsic value of children - a moral judgement. When we pass regulations to protect the
environment, there is an inherent sense that this is the "right"
thing to do ... and that sense of "right" is, at root, a "moral
judgement."
When we prohibit murder,
it's a reflection of a moral presupposition about the value of human life.
I could go on, but laws
are based in collective sociological "morality". The real question is
... "WHOSE morals are we going to legislate?"
"The
prohibition of cannabis has failed, just as the prohibition of alcohol did
years ago. However, prohibiting cannabis does effectively support organized
crime and all the problems that come along with it. I think our current policies
regarding cannabis have been an abysmal failure for years, and yet we continue
to approach it the same way. I personally want to learn from this mistake. In
order find new solutions to the situation we find ourselves in with our current
policies."
“Here's my take
on it. Legalize it and control it. That way, maybe my 17-year-old who is still
using the damn stuff (I never have) and whose psychiatrist has told him to stop
because it can make his mental-health issues worse might not be able to get it so
easily. Not saying it would stop but make it harder because this kid, in
particular, always goes with the easiest way right now as he struggles with his
mental- and physical-health issues. And I have no credibility in this battle
with him because I never did any of that stuff ever.”
As long as tobacco and alcohol
are on the shelves it makes no sense. Does this mean I think that tobacco and
Alcohol should be banned? Certainly not... It is up to the individual to decide
what goes in there body. The government should only punish what comes out, based
on the effect that it has on others around them. Overall they are doing a good
job with that in regards to alcohol and tobacco and the same can be done for
pot.
I think
Pot should be decriminalized simply because there are too many people smoking
it, and like vagrancy laws went out with the hippies, so should this
prohibition.
It's sad that young people are branded with the stigma of a criminal record when maybe their teacher is smoking pot in his/her car. Personally, I don't like the smell of pot but if others want to light up (not inside my home), go ahead. I won't judge them.
It's sad that young people are branded with the stigma of a criminal record when maybe their teacher is smoking pot in his/her car. Personally, I don't like the smell of pot but if others want to light up (not inside my home), go ahead. I won't judge them.
When
people say pot will lead to heavier drugs I ask them; "why didn't
cigarettes lead to pot then?" Take
the profit from the drug traffickers and tax and regulate pot.
Cigarettes
are highly addictive. I still struggle with the addiction but have not had lit
one up since June 1st. Cigarettes are legal so why isn't pot? In our lifetime
we've all had smoking friends but very few of them ever smoked pot on a regular
basis. We can't brand our kids for doing what many teachers do themselves.
“Food for thought
… if you were to survey the average recreational pot user, you would find that,
they are not putting up much of a fight at this point to legalize. The reason
is that they are afraid that once the government gets involved with making pot
or regulates it, the quality that they are used to would drop considerably.”
Food
for thought for sure, and again on a topic that will come up over and over
again until both federal and provincial governments ask for, and seek, our
opinions more often. The doors not
closed yet on this discussion, so feel free to add your thoughts; I’d be
delighted to hear what you have to think.
By
the way, just before I wrap this up today, I had posted the following comment
on my Facebook page early last night; it had an almost immediate response:
Me: This
has been an interesting exercise ... there have been some very interesting
comments made, and what is surprising me is they are mainly coming from small
'c' conservatives. I would bet this would surprise a lot of people.
Response: Alan I remember once being pulled over by a cop who reeked of pot. There are a lot of Conservatives who smoke pot. There are a lot of Liberals who don't smoke pot. But people in all professions and walks in life do smoke it recreationally. I think those who don't smoke pot make it a moral issue with the attitude of "I'm gooder or better than them that do". If I did like pot I would smoke it.
Response: Alan I remember once being pulled over by a cop who reeked of pot. There are a lot of Conservatives who smoke pot. There are a lot of Liberals who don't smoke pot. But people in all professions and walks in life do smoke it recreationally. I think those who don't smoke pot make it a moral issue with the attitude of "I'm gooder or better than them that do". If I did like pot I would smoke it.
That’s
all for now. I’m Alan Forseth in
Kamloops; with the thoughts of one conservative … and some from a few
other folks as well.
No comments:
Post a Comment