Merritt Home to First BC Conservative Candidate to Declare in the running for the Fraser Nicola Riding

BC Conservative Party members, from across the Fraser Nicola electoral district, gathered this afternoon in the Cache Creek community hall.

"Today's event was to officially bring in to existence the BC Conservative Party Constituency Association for Fraser Nicola ... and secondly to hear the announcement of the first person who has declared they will seek the nod of members to run in next Mays provincial election", declared Regional Director Alan Forseth.

New Constituency Association President Dan
Cummins (L)  talks with Board Director Ted Lund

Elected to the first board were Dan Cummings of Savona, Wayne Ferguson of Seton Portage, Ted Lund of Merritt, Patrick Mulldoon of Logan Lake, Shaun Freeman of Savona, as well as Michael Beauclair of Merritt.

Following the election of the board members, Forseth then went on to announce the first person approved to seek the nomination for Fraser Nicola.

"It is my pleasure today to introduce you to an individual who is married, has two children, and who lives in the community of Merritt. He has worked with timber for over 24 years, and has scale and graded our provinces most precious natural resource for 17 years on the Coast and the Interior."

"That individual is Michael Beauclair"

Mr. Beauclair spoke for several minutes, talking the time to let members know a bit about himself, and the things that are, and will be, important to voters in the riding in the next election.

The six year old is only a child playing a game -- the fiscal well-being of our province however, is NOT child's play

I caught news at top of hour this morning (10am - Nov 28th) on the LATEST increases to BC's provincial deficit.

Sadly, none of this should have been news to Christy Clark and the BC Liberals.

Right after the news update, CKNW's Bill Good then asked what people thought of the increase ... and if they were concerned.

THEY SHOULD BE!

IF the media made it clear (if they themselves even understand it) people would indeed be VERY concerned, with the long term results, of these ever increasing annual budget deficits!  The DEBT is ballooning, and it has to get paid at some point.  We cannot simply keep on borrowing.

People don't understand what these deficits mean, and are doing, and that is a shame.  I also think that is what the government is counting on. 

Hundreds of millions more is being added to the provincial debt, by Christy Clark and the BC Liberals.  That's much the same -- no it's actually identical -- to what was happening with the NDP government who held power before them.

The result of that is millions and millions of dollars, EACH DAY, that are NOT available to provide services to British Columbians. Instead, those dollars ($6.5 million daily!) go to make interest payments on that debt -- payments to foreign countries and financial institutions.

Let's look at it this way.

Christy Clark can say her Liberal government is being fiscally responsible, and accountable, with taxpayer dollars.  

 

A six year old can also claim to be a rocket scientist.

Neither is true ... but at least the six year old is only a child playing a game.  The fiscal well-being of our province however, is NOT child's play.

I'm Alan Forseth in Kamloops, with the thoughts of one conservative.

TAXES ... they often are a knee jerk reaction to financial distress governments in most cases have created themselves

A couple of weeks ago I posted a quote by Winston Churchill on my Facebook page; the quote was, "There is no such thing as a good tax."  Boy did that ever generate a LOT of comment.

C.S. Except when that tax pays for things that benefit society, that help people who need help, that makes sure our children are educated and that people receive medical treatment, that helps to make sure that everyone is taken care of.......etc etc.

ME: True ... but look at the wording ... "good" tax

There really is NO good tax as taxes inherently impact the 'total' population to unequal degrees. That being the case, ALL taxes should be carefully thought out, and planned, to get maximum benefit, and to be applied across the board as fairly possible.

A good example (to me) is the Carbon Tax which is very much unequally applied across the province -- hitting those in the interior and north far more than those to the south and in the larger cities.

We have the same thing now with tolls.  Some area that have had transportation infrastructure already completed, are seeing people driving free and clear of tolls -- however, people in other areas are now being targeted for tolls as new projects are completed.

Churchill is right ... There is no such thing as a good tax

C.S.  I disagree. Taxes are not good or bad. They are a necessary part of any society that believes that some things are a collective responsibility.

ME:  Necessary? -- yes I agree -- but again the trouble in most cases, I believe, is they are not well thought out.  They often are a knee jerk reaction to financial distress governments in most cases have created themselves.

Personally I am in favor of a flat tax, that would apply equally to all across the board, to all above 'above' a set income level

E.W. -- in reply to CS ... "To make sure everyone is taken care of . . ." Therein lies the problem - everyone - rather than those in genuine need due to circumstances beyond their control. Having everything "free" to all who demand is what has caused many of the problems we endure today. A little more self-reliance and personal responsibility would go a long way.

L.M. Therein lies the difference between a Liberal Democrat and a Conservative....makes the world go around...slowly, but around.

C.S.  Our systems are wholly inadequate, and mismanaged - I agree. I don't support the concept of a flat tax, however. What's the statistic.....90 percent of the wealth is held by 10 percent of the population? The rich get richer, and the poor get poorer. A flat tax does nothing to address that - in fact, it makes it worse.  Unless ALL tax breaks and write-offs were eliminated.

M.U.  That's the theory behind a flat tax - although it could contain a Minimum base level so nobody under a certain income would pay taxes. That could really be set at any standard that governments chose. With no other deductions, "the rich" would pay a percentage of their total income with no other deductions. That would make it fair.  Hopefully, that would eliminate the income tax claw-back for old pharts like me who live on CPP. Sounds fair to me.

C.S.  And the corporate tax structure would need to be looked at, as well. This race to the bottom on corporations paying their share is not working. We cannot and should not try to compete with countries that are not on a level playing field when it comes to environmental, labour and other laws and standards that we consider important as a society, and that do not have the social systems in place that our taxes pay for. Unfettered free trade does NOT work.

S.B.  You would have loved Peter Pockington who campaigned on a flat tax of 10%, but really he was only gathering support and votes for Mulroney to be leader of the Progressive Conservative Party. Their scheme worked. Mulroney became our Prime Minister. Peter "Puck" went his merry way into bankruptcy and other schemes that brought him trouble.  I don't know why the flat tax idea won't fly among those who get in power...

ME:  Personally??? I think it's because a Flat Tax is too simple, and can't really be manipulated.

Stayed tuned Mel .. we'll continue to roll things out in the weeks and months ahead

The Armchair Mayor, Mel Rothenburger

Well know newspaper man, and former Kamloops Mayor Mel Rothenburger, penned his latest Armchair Mayor column on the weekend.  It was entitled, "Sorting out facts from BS not easy".

It was a good editorial, although I did mention to Mel that I did not agree with his opinion John Cummins was not taking a stand on issues. 

I told him that John has indeed been very clear on a number of issues, of great importance to the people of BC.  He will continue to do so in the weeks and months ahead leading to next May's general election.

Armchair Mayor Mel responded by stating to that he had:"

"... listened to Mr. Cummins' AGM speech, all 39 minutes-plus of it, and pretty much all he did was rehash old news stories about the Liberals and be very clear that the B.C. Conservatives would do things differently.  How? Good question.  Ajax? He's "not ready to weigh in on that."  Kamloops? As next spring's provincial election draws ever nearer, still no Conservative candidates for our two ridings, no one wanting the nomination, and no policies on local issues."

Normally I would have said we hadn’t heard the same speech; however I have it good authority that we both did (me in person -- and Mel via the internet). 

Regardless, I was there and heard it live .. and it was powerful and it was moving.

John Cummins pointed out some serious concerns we as BC Conservatives have with how the Liberals are governing -- and we are not the only ones having those concerns ... not by a long shot.

Big spending -- big government -- big deficits and BIGGER debts!  They all top most lists.

Government crown corporations and agencies with out of control management ... and need we mention Community Living BC again ... there's rising fees that we have no say in (I challenge you to look at the amount Medical Services Plan rates have increased over the past decade).

The stench of the BC Rail sale has never cleared, and no amount of Febreze is going to help ... Christy Clark is desperately tryng to straddle both sides of the Enbridge pipeline proposal, while at the same time 'playing politics' with the Alberta government in a phony game of hardball.