My viewpoint on political happenings in BC ... and odds and ends of this and that
Friday, May 24, 2013
The question that needed asking was, "So where do the Conservatives go from here?"
It's conversation time again ... this time Alan and Allen ... as the question is asked of me, "What went wrong, and where do we go from here."
These kinds of conversations are going on all over the province and so it would seem to me that there is much value to be gained from sharing thoughts, questions, and suggestions amongst each other.
This then, is another of several I have had in recent days:
Hi, Alan,
I would be interested in your take on the election results. It seems to me that John focused all his energy in attacking Christy Clark rather than the NDP, in expectation that she was vulnerable and the Conservatives could pick up Liberal seats.
Obviously, like the pollsters, he got it wrong. So where do the Conservatives go from here?
Hello again Allen, and thanks for your email ...
Boy there is sure a lot to look at and digest from the election. The bottom line, in my opinion, is that we were strategically wounded last Summer and Fall, and the party and leadership were never able to recover. The party tried to make several attempts to highlight positions of importance, that would make real positive change across the board to the people of BC, but the clamour we were spiraling down (fed by polls and media pundits) only re-enforced that we were not yet ready to govern.
That said, we now have the opportunity to build a strong party, and leadership at all levels will also need to be looked at; from the local CA level right to the top.
The beliefs and principles of our party ARE important, and we as BC Conservatives need to present our party as a clear alternative to the BC Liberals -- AND the NDP. I hope that you will be encouraged to support our party, to perhaps take a step towards being part of the local CA Board, and to show others that BC Conservatives will have a message integrity and accountability in the platform and policies we will take to voters next time round.
Thanks again for getting in touch ... and have a great day ...
Thanks, Alan, this is as I have expected.
I do think that we were wounded, as you say, and I also supported our leader, but I hope that he will recognize the value of stepping aside and encouraging the search for a new leader. He did not seem to ever connect with the public, and it was not all the fault of the media.
I think they gave him a fair opportunity to set forth his message as one of the four leaders. I also thought that the things he said, and the policies he set forth had opportunity to resonate with the electorate, but I believe his strategy was wrong, and his negativity towards Christy Clark backfired.
Thursday, May 23, 2013
There is, as I see it, only two directions we can go in this situation of ethics, accountability, and integrity.
Call me Don Quixote if you like, (others have), but I am going to continue in my belief that there is indeed positive change about to begin |
I find it
interesting to see the following from Nik Nanos (Few see positives in currentpolitical climate), after my comment, posted to Facebook yesterday, on the
federal Conservative party:
There's a bit of a pox on all your houses, so to speak, from all the parties. Canadians are seeing dysfunction in Parliament and in government from all parties when it comes to politicians focusing on positive solutions to problems affecting Canadians.
But these numbers are particularly troubling for the Conservatives. If you're the sitting government, you're looking at numbers like this and Canadians are saying, 'you know what — you're not doing much for me right now in terms with helping me in my day-to-day life'.
So what
did I post yesterday? Well it was one
short simple comment, which I was delighted to see engaged a few people in
conversation, which I now share with you:
My growing disappointment in the federal
conservative party is continuing ... and I know I am not alone in this.
"Merv": Yes, but what's the alternative?
Me: I think that an alternative / shakeup will
be inevitable, IF the federal party does not find its roots once again.
"Sandy ":
My
Conservative/conservator roots go a long way back. I even ran as a Conservative
candidate in the 1993 Kim Campbell election debacle and was steamrollered by
the Reform candidate in this riding.
I only
mention this so that you can understand my own disappointment in the
performance of Duffy and Wallin but I am still a firm supporter and believer in
Stephen Harper's leadership.
Before
anyone runs screaming into the darkness, think of the alternative - Canada under
the domination of eastern Liberals led by a Trudeau. In British
Columbia and Alberta
we should always remember what Trudeau Liberalism can do to our economy.
Duffy and
Wallin should be thrown out of the senate, along with anyone else found in
conflict with ethical standards. That would include the Liberal senator also
facing an inquiry into his expense claims.
Me:
Thanks for your comments Sandy --- I
posed this today to see what thoughts and ideas would come from others. As I
say, I am sure I am not the only one with growing concerns.
The federal Conservative Party must, in my opinion, begin to look at why it's
own supporters are beginning to question if it is losing its way, and how that
should be addressed. If not, then it's future may be in jeopardy.
"Damir":
Sure,
I'll dog pile here. As a former PC/C voter who is quite concerned with the
current situation in Ottawa ,
my 2015 vote is now completely up for grabs. What was done with the
parliamentary budget office is, IMO, no better than the shameful way Victoria dealt with the
auditor general. And what the heck ever happened to Senate reform?
Since the merger, the leadership is increasingly not walking the talk. Time for
a change, either internally or externally.
No free pass just because the ghost of Trudeau is back in charge of the Liberals.
Tuesday, May 21, 2013
Wouldn't you agree? Is this a legitimate expectation we should have?
Once upon
a time a popular opposition firebrand named Christy Clark, stood up in the BC
Legislature, to rip the NDP government for spending tax dollars on shameless,
self-promoting advertising.
“People don't want the government to spend 700 grand of their money so they can find out how to access services; people want this government to spend their money so that those services are there for them to access. That's what British Columbians want,”Clark
railed. “How many firefighters, how many
police officers will not be on the street because [the Finance Minister] is
spending… on her advertising campaign?”
The above is from an opinion / editorial piece by BC Taxpayers Federation Director Jordan Bateman (November 2012) entitled, "Government Ads Use and Abuse Taxpayers’ Money".
For month prior to the May 14th provincial election campaign, the BC Liberals took hits from all quarters, on this clearly wasteful and partisan adverting campaign.
Sadly, during the four week election campaign, it was all but forgotten ... even by former radio co-worker Bill Good who on November 16th, over the airwaves of CKNW had stated: "Those are very partisan ads. They should be bought and paid for by the Liberal Party of BC."
The election is of course ended a week ago, but perhaps the major political commentators such as Keith Baldrey, Vaughn Palmer, Bill Tieleman, Michael Smyth, etc, will now ask this question which I now pose:
"Will the Premier comment to ending this kind of self-promotion and stick to truly informative ads providing BC residents with 'needed' information?"
I believe if she does this, it really will help to put her on a more solid footing with a large number of British Columbians who still sit in two distinct camps; those who didn't vote for her ( over 55%) ... and those who again for a number of reasons(including a belief it doesn't make any difference) didn't cast a vote at all (approximately 48%).
By the way, this is equally a fair question to ask of Adrian Dix and the NDP, as he himself had also pushed for a ban on partisan information being presented in government advertising being paid for by taxpayers, and had indicated that if elected he would put forward legislation to stop this from happening again.
So I put the question forward to both leaders then; are you against partisan political advertising which is paid for by taxpayers, and will you put forward legislation / support legislation, that would see this in place and enforced?
It's fair question to ask this, and the taxpayers of BC should have every right to know the answer ... wouldn't you agree?
Is this a legitimate expectation we should have of government?
I'm Alan Forseth inKamloops ,
with the thoughts of one conservative. The floor is now being turned over to you ... and I welcome your thoughts on this.
“People don't want the government to spend 700 grand of their money so they can find out how to access services; people want this government to spend their money so that those services are there for them to access. That's what British Columbians want,”
The above is from an opinion / editorial piece by BC Taxpayers Federation Director Jordan Bateman (November 2012) entitled, "Government Ads Use and Abuse Taxpayers’ Money".
For month prior to the May 14th provincial election campaign, the BC Liberals took hits from all quarters, on this clearly wasteful and partisan adverting campaign.
Sadly, during the four week election campaign, it was all but forgotten ... even by former radio co-worker Bill Good who on November 16th, over the airwaves of CKNW had stated: "Those are very partisan ads. They should be bought and paid for by the Liberal Party of BC."
The election is of course ended a week ago, but perhaps the major political commentators such as Keith Baldrey, Vaughn Palmer, Bill Tieleman, Michael Smyth, etc, will now ask this question which I now pose:
"Will the Premier comment to ending this kind of self-promotion and stick to truly informative ads providing BC residents with 'needed' information?"
I believe if she does this, it really will help to put her on a more solid footing with a large number of British Columbians who still sit in two distinct camps; those who didn't vote for her ( over 55%) ... and those who again for a number of reasons(including a belief it doesn't make any difference) didn't cast a vote at all (approximately 48%).
By the way, this is equally a fair question to ask of Adrian Dix and the NDP, as he himself had also pushed for a ban on partisan information being presented in government advertising being paid for by taxpayers, and had indicated that if elected he would put forward legislation to stop this from happening again.
So I put the question forward to both leaders then; are you against partisan political advertising which is paid for by taxpayers, and will you put forward legislation / support legislation, that would see this in place and enforced?
It's fair question to ask this, and the taxpayers of BC should have every right to know the answer ... wouldn't you agree?
Is this a legitimate expectation we should have of government?
I'm Alan Forseth in
Labels:
bc,
bc liberals,
bill good,
bill tieleman,
christy clark,
cknw,
conservative,
Jordan Bateman,
kamloops,
keith baldrey,
legislature,
liberal party,
Michael Smyth,
premier,
taxpayers,
Vaughn Palmer
Monday, May 20, 2013
The time to lick wounds is over --- the time to show we still BELIEVE in BC begins right now!
For those who have never met me (July 2012) |
The other day I made a comment and post stating: "People may say they are concerned about the kind of representation (or lack of it) they are receiving -- but it seems we can be led to support a political party that paints the other as the lesser of two evils -- no matter what options may be available from choices available across the political spectrum. Thus, in my opinion, the momentum for the downward spiral continues ... "
It was the start to my first Conservative Thoughts post (http://
I have been asked for my thoughts on why we were not able to connect with voters ... my thoughts on the campaign ... where we went wrong ... did we attack the Liberals (and / or the NDP) hard enough. One of the best comments posed however, at least in my opinion, was as follows: "Define the ballot issue then define your opponent - a recipe for victory every time."
My response was:Again I can only speak for what we tried to do here in Kamloops ... that 'was' to define an issue which we felt everything else flowed from.
Specifically that issue was: "Do BC Liberal Todd Stone, or the NDPs Tom Friedman, have the full authority of both party / leader to truly represent the interest of the people of Kamloops South Thompson on issues of concern to them? Or when push came to shove, would they have to follow the party line?". Whether it was hospital care, Ajax Mine, the Carbon Tax, new / increasing fees, rising debt, educational needs, or a multitude of other things, we wanted to know that answer, and felt that voters should as well.
Call me Don Quixote, but I still believe it was the right question / issue to raise; it simply did not get heard ... and for whatever reason, it was not something which the media (which I was part of for 25 years) chose to ask and get a direct answer to. In the end, this campaign again boiled down to 'fear' of one party over the other. That was, at least in my opinion, the only issue that defined this campaign.
Was I wrong? Lots of people I am sure will think so, and there's nothing wrong with that. There will likely be as many reasons why we lost, as there are individuals.
Regardless however, we DID increase our popular vote. People DO want our voice to be heard, and they DO want to have BC Conservatives on the ballot ... WE DO have a message that is important.
So now, we get down to the nitty-gritty.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)