How
can anyone think that a having new Municipal Auditor General (MAG), imposed on
municipalities by the provincial government, will be anything more than a way
to deflect from the BC Liberal governments own poor management of taxpayer
resources???
Kamloops
city councilor John DeCicco was quoted in a Kamloops Daily News story saying, "It's going to be given to us whether we like
it or not. The resolution is to disagree, but for the UBCM executive to work
with the province on it ... concerns we had ... costs for small municipalities
... shouldn't be a burden."
He
also indicated another big sticking point with the whole concept and idea; the related costs for this new position, and the costs to do the audits.
"Who's going to pay for it? It starts from
the province, but it goes down to you and I”
Here’s something I find equally interesting, as I believe it goes more to
the real rationale of why this is bring proposed.
The Kamloops Daily News story goes on to say that findings from the Municipal Auditor General will not be reported to the legislature … they will not be making binding recommendations ... and they will only be releasing findings to the media.
The Kamloops Daily News story goes on to say that findings from the Municipal Auditor General will not be reported to the legislature … they will not be making binding recommendations ... and they will only be releasing findings to the media.
This
whole idea didn’t make sense to start with --- and it makes even less sense now.
Oh ... but wait
a minute … it does actually make sense after all.
Increasing
provincial deficits and debt by our current Liberal government means deflect
--- deflect --- deflect. It means deflect away
from their own incompetence, ineffectiveness, ineptitude, and a whole lot of
other “in” words.
Right … that does make perfect sense now.
By
contrast, here is the BC Conservative Party idea of managing taxpayer
resources:
Every tax dollar collected from British Columbians is impressed with a
trust. This trust must be managed and
accounted for according the highest of integrity and transparency. The people’s scrutiny of all spending decisions
should be encouraged and welcomed.
On
September 16th, Harvey Oberfeld said this in an editorial (Conservatives
REALLY Frighten BC Liberals!) as he discussed the crazy Liberal attack ads on
John Cummins and the BC Conservative Party:
“All
the while Cummins and the Conservatives will continue to grow and build as an
HONOURABLE free enterprise alternative to the NDP … and the Liberals.”
Harvey Oberfeld is right … that is exactly what John Cummins and the BC Conservative Party plan to do … it is exactly what they ARE DOING!
I'm Alan Forseth in Kamloops ... with the thoughts of one conservative on this round ball called planet earth.
Hey
... I'm back. Since I wrote this piece
earlier this morning, I came across the following from Vaughn Palmer in today's
Vancouver Sun; Transparency
hard to find in B.C.'s shoddy bookkeeping
The
article said that Auditor-General John Doyle's latest verdict on the B.C.
Liberal government's bookkeeping can be reduced to a single word:
"Unacceptable" ... "for a government that strives for transparency and
accountability, this is unacceptable."
He
(John Doyle) went further and ... cited
the Liberals for a range of accounting errors, some major, some minor, some
debatable, others falling under the heading of just plain wrong.
This article, by Vaughn Palmer, goes on to say:
This article, by Vaughn Palmer, goes on to say:
The government reports a running tally in the fine print of the
public accounts, a point noted here previously. It thereby meets the
bare minimum requirements of public sector accounting standards, a point
Doyle concedes. But he goes on to say that's not good enough to satisfy the broader public interest in accountability.
"The
expected payment streams associated with these obligations directly
impact the remaining amount of discretionary funds available to
government to meet future needs," wrote Doyle, as he urged the
government to disclose considerably more detail to help taxpayers better
understand the multi-billion-dollar commitments being undertaken in
their name.
A
friend of mine, with membership in NO political parties, made the following
comment on seeing and reading this ... “Pretty strong statements about a government
that wants to impose an auditor on municipalities. Maybe the provincial
government thinks all levels of government in B.C. function as ineptly as they
do themselves.”
I'd have to agree!
I'd have to agree!
No comments:
Post a Comment