What a coward ... what a two-faced babble mouthed clown

Some of you may have already read this editorial, in the June 21^st edition of the National Post, by Rex Murphy.  The opinion piece was entitled, “In Justin Trudeau’s world, Christians need not apply”.  (http://fullcomment.nationalpost.com/2014/06/21/rex-murphy-in-justin-trudeaus-world-christians-need-not-apply). 


This of course is just my opinion, but Trudeau deserves to be soundly rebuked by every Canadian that believes in the democratic rights of ALL Canadians.  The great golden boy Justin Trudeau --- the defender of the Charter of so-called Rights and Freedoms – is himself now telling card-carrying Liberal Party members, to take a hike and stuff their democratic rights in the crapper.

With his not to be questioned dictate, democracy to Justin Trudeau is from hereafter to be as follows … vote and do as I say; period, full stop.  No independent thought, or discussion, will be allowed.

Trudeau recently said he admired the Communist Chinese government, and you may remember news stories, with segments such as the following from the CBC late last year:

Liberal leader was asked which nation he admired most. He responded: "There's a level of admiration I actually have for China. Their basic dictatorship is actually allowing them to turn their economy around on a dime."

That statement was upsetting for people who say they were wrongly imprisoned or tortured by the Chinese government for speaking out for democracy.

"Can I use the word 'foolish'"? said one member of the Federation for a Democratic China, characterizing Trudeau's words. The political group advocates for the democratization of China …

Federal NDP Leader Thomas Mulcair also reacted with surprise to the Liberal leader's words, calling it "a bit silly" to laud China rather than to praise democratic values.

Trudeau was praising a government known for being a basic dictatorship.  Well it now seems this ‘silly’ and ‘foolish’ leader of a federal political party is now taking a page from their totalitarian playbook of the Chinese Communist Party; NO dissent will be allowed.

What's wrong mini-Pierre; are you afraid to give Liberal Party members the right to choose who they wish to represent them? Are you afraid to let Canadians exercise their democratic rights? 

What a coward ... what a two-faced babble mouthed clown.

Democracy means allowing Canadians to vote for who they want to vote for, NOT who you select for them to vote for!

The next federal election cannot come soon enough, when Canadians can hopefully banish this so-called second-coming of Trudeaumania, to the scrap heap where he belongs.


As Shakespeare stated in Romeo and Juliet … “A plague on both of your houses”

We need less studies,and more action, towards job creation

Today the CBC came out with the story … “BC income gap getting worse”.  In it, they stated:

The first measurement looks at household income and found that BC is second only to Alberta as having the greatest inequality of any province.

In the second measurement, BC ranked dead last, having the biggest gap between the top and bottom 20 per cent of income earners.

The report notes that the gap has increased since the early 1990s and that other provinces have had more success redistributing income through taxes and benefits.

Ouch … redistribution of wealth!!!  Redistribution of wealth is not the answer! 

YES … we do need to have social programs that help those individuals, and families, who are in need and are unable to provide the necessities they require (food and shelter).  Redistribution of wealth however should not be taking from one group to give to another.

To reduce the necessity to provide what is needed for those on low or no incomes, we need a vigorous and aggressive plan to get BC moving forward with good quality high pay jobs in traditional areas that have always provided them … as well as in the new technologies.

Those of us in the middle class are getting squeezed tighter and tighter with higher fees and taxes --- and no resulting / corresponding increases in wages to meet these increased costs.

The fall-back answer is, “We can’t afford it” … and ... "You're not bad enough YET to get services"

How many of you have seen / read the CBC news story, "B.C. school shorting autistic son, mother says"?

In part the story says that only part of the special education funding allocated to a six year old, grade one boy with autism, is being used to help him at school.  His mother says, "He's not getting the support he needs"

Now before anyone says, “… there isn’t the money in the system to provide the care this boy needs …” you may be interested to know that there are two different government ministries which are providing $36,000 to the school district where the young boy, named Cooper, is enrolled.

Would anyone care to venture a guess as to why Cooper is NOT getting the supports that he should be receiving … and that the school district is receiving funds for?    

Cooper’s mother, Crystal Gerrits, was told, “...  if he was acting out more, Cooper would get more time with an assistant."