"Under our feet lies as much energy as
I'll come back to this
shortly.
With the
Final Hearings and Questioning Phase yet to be held, by the Enbridge Northern
Gateway Project Joint Review Panel, the BC Liberal government Environment
Minister, Terry Lake , has already announced "Our
questions were not satisfactorily answered during these hearings."
For those
unaware ... there are still twelve days of hearings yet to be held in Terrace
from June 17th and 28th. Would it not
seem to be in BC's best interests to wait for them (the hearings) to conclude before
coming to that decision?
BC
needs a provincial government that is prepared to work with and for British
Columbians, to implement policies that take full advantage of our natural
resources, our geographic position, and our hard-working residents.
Yet
despite that, and just two short weeks after the provincial election, both
Premier Christy Clark, and Environment Minister Terry Lake, are both showing
the Liberals are going to be a failure in that area.
Our
province has suffered ongoing interprovincial population loses since Christy
Clark first became Premier two and a half years ago. With Environment Minister Terry Lake 's
announcement Friday, the people of BC can except that trend, officially
documented and recorded by BC Stats, will continue.
Once
again, this government, led by Premier Christy Clark, is about to betray the
hard working men and women of the Peace River and Northern BC, by rejecting the
Northern Gateway development, before the Review Panel completes its duties.
It's one
thing to criticize, but what are your expectations; what will satisfy your
government? Both Terry Lake
and Christy Clark can't simply say they are opposed. What is the government's real position; and
what outcomes do you need to have met, so that they can be realistically
addressed.
In a story on Saturday (June 1st), in the Kamloops
Daily News, they state:
Alberta Environment and Sustainable Resource Development Minister Diana McQueen issued a statement saying the two provinces have a shared commitment to both protecting the environment and economic growth.
Alberta Environment and Sustainable Resource Development Minister Diana McQueen issued a statement saying the two provinces have a shared commitment to both protecting the environment and economic growth.
“I understand from B.C.’s announcement today that the government is not
comfortable supporting the project as proposed without more assurance that
environmental protection and public safety are adequately addressed. B.C., like Alberta , wants to ensure that our energy
development is responsible and safe.”
Meantime that same Kamloops Daily News story goes on
to say that ...
Janet Holder, executive
vice-president for Enbridge, did not interpret the province’s submission as a
rejection of the pipeline, but rather affirmation of the five conditions for
approval that B.C. announced last year. Those conditions can’t be fully met until the panel process is complete at the end of this year, she said. In the interim, Northern Gateway will work with the province to meet those conditions. “We are working hard to meet the conditions and earn the confidence of the government and the people of BC".
Further stating that the ... company is committed to building a pipeline and marine terminal project that “meets the highest possible safety and environmental standards anywhere in the world — and a project that creates new jobs and opportunities for British Columbians.”
Now ... let's go back to that quote from the BC Liberal election platform, that I began today's post with:
"Under our feet lies as much energy as
Could this in fact be the real reason for the BC Liberal government to be declaring, that they will not agree to the Northern Gateway Pipeline proceeding through British Columbia, before the hearings are over?
And what of concerns, by many, that by the time we get BC's LNG projects online, there will be a glut on the market driving down prices?
Here's one thing that our Environment Minister has also not be so forthcoming on; this decision will likely mean that we may now the oil moved by rail car, through the province, to the coast of
That said, I for one have to think that moving the oil through a pipeline would be far safer than it would be by rail car.
And finally ... I have to wonder why the BC government didn't simply wait the last couple of weeks remaining, for the official hearings to complete, before announcing their decision.
I'm Alan Forseth in
Web-links ... Notes ... Odds' and
Ends ...
The Joint
Review Panel for the Enbridge Northern Gateway Project is an independent body,
mandated by the Minister of the Environment and the National Energy Board. The
Panel is charged with assessing the environmental effects of the proposed
project and review the application under both the Canadian Environmental
Assessment Act and the National Energy Board Act.
Details and information on the specific process, the Joint Review Panel was to
follow, is available at http://gatewaypanel.review-examen.gc.ca/clf-nsi/bts/jntrvwprcss-eng.html
Here is the link to Friday's news release by the BC
government: http://www2.news.gov.bc.ca/news_releases_2009-2013/2013ENV0057-000930.htm
Links to news stories on Terry Lake 's
announcement from Friday (May 30th)
- http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/story/2013/05/31/bc-northern-gateway-rejected.html
- http://globalnews.ca/news/605338/facing-northern-gateway-setback-enbridge-launches-charm-offensive-elsewhere/
- http://www.theprovince.com/news/Environmentalists+cheer+government+rejects+Enbridge+Northern/8462955/story.html
- http://www.kamloopsnews.ca/article/20130531/KAMLOOPS0101/130539965/-1/KAMLOOPS/bc-rejects-northern-gateway-pipeline
No comments:
Post a Comment